Dept of Parks & Recreation

Ahead of the filing

Analyses, audits and policy that come before a budget request: the Legislative Analyst's reviews that name this department, the State Auditor's and Finance's audit reports on it, the Inspector General's where one exists, and the Department of Technology's letters that bind every department. Each row is the source's own published title, linked, fetched weekly. These are not filings. No figure in this runbook rests on them, and nothing is inferred from them beyond that they exist and when. An audit finding is the department's own reason for its next budget request, which is why it is here.

On a budget subcommittee agenda

The day a request is heard, from the committee's own agenda. A date after the as-of date is a hearing still to come.

Named in a Legislative Analyst review

On CDT's own reports to the Legislature

What the Department of Technology told the Legislature about this department, in its words, from the newest edition of each report. A statement to the Legislature, not a purchase order; nothing here is a figure in this runbook.

Dated on the state's own Roadmap 2026

Key results from Envision 2026's third-year Roadmap, in the state's words with the quarter it set itself. Listed where the result bears on a layer this department runs, or binds every department. A date that has passed is a date that has passed; whether the result landed is CDT's annual report to say.

Binding on every department

Forward demand

Budget asked for, not yet spent. Scoped by department and never by category — a budget request predates the purchase that would classify it.

What the timing means

Stages are gates of SIMM 19 — Project Approval Lifecycle (PAL) and GenAI Project Delivery Lifecycle, from CDT's published tracker.

Plays

Ranked. A tier is a claim about evidence, not about enthusiasm — Unverified means the filings raise the question and do not answer it.

Also worth asking

Questions with no play behind them yet: a request no order names, a hearing inside the window.

Where you stand

In the last 5 years Dept of Parks & Recreation has filed $149,872,839 across 2,253 purchase orders with 325 suppliers. You hold $4,025,403 of it — 2.7%.

Since your first order here in 2017: $5,059,682 across 46 orders, 1.9% of the department's $263,408,242.

Renewal calendar

Every dated term here ending in the next twelve months, in the order they fall due. A renewal is a growth conversation: each row carries the manufacturer the paper names, the term, who carried it, whether you have held the category here before, and what the same supplier sold beside it. Filed end dates only — where a purchase order carries the same start and end date that is a delivery date, not a term, and it is excluded.

27 more in the year — ask the advisor.

1 of these are yours, worth $763.

The stack, by layer

What this department runs, by the budget each product competes for, on the last 5 years (since Oct 20, 2021). A manufacturer appears only where a line item names one of its products, so every figure is a floor and the share is of what the paper names at that layer, not of everything bought there. Supplier is the reseller who carried it. A purchase record, not an install base.

Network infrastructure — $3,884,966 named across 35 orders

End user computing hardware — $2,116,363 named across 211 orders

IT service management and workflow — $1,679,479 named across 7 orders

Application delivery and load balancing — $923,614 named across 3 orders

Enterprise asset and facilities management — $864,806 named across 5 orders

Identity and access management — $609,196 named across 7 orders

Hypervisor and virtualisation platform — $143,887 named across 5 orders

Audio visual and conferencing hardware — $29,312 named across 8 orders

Messaging and collaboration platforms — $10,626 named across 5 orders

10 more layer(s) — ask the advisor.

People

Technology leadership first: the CIO, CISO and CTO on file, then IT leadership and management, then other executives. Technical and executive staff, not procurement — buyers of record process the paper, they do not choose the product and they do not answer cold mail. Published state addresses for this department only. The record holds no CIO, CISO or CTO title for this department; that is a gap in the directory, not proof the role is vacant.

Buyers of record

These are procurement. They process the paper; they do not choose the product and they do not answer cold mail. Email addresses are not published in this runbook — they are released on request and the release is logged.

Manufacturers in this department

What each one is worth here, counting every line item once. Read from purchase order line text — the supplier on a California purchase order is the reseller, not the manufacturer. A purchase record, not an install base.

Products last bought in the last 5 years (since Oct 20, 2021). 16 more were last bought before that; ask the advisor for them.

Products detected

Do not add these together. Product patterns overlap, so one line item can match two products from the same manufacturer. Use the manufacturer totals above for any question about a vendor’s total.

4 more detected — ask the advisor.